
Getting the Numbers Right Is Not Enough: What Makes a Good Financial Close?
The year-end financial statements are completed. The numbers are right. Eventually, all the necessary information comes together.
So, does that mean the process works well?
Not necessarily.
The quality of a finance function often becomes apparent long before year-end.
Sometimes, the warning signs are very practical: invoices are issued late, outstanding items are not followed up consistently, or management lacks a clear and timely view of the company's financial position.
Elsewhere, information for reporting or the financial close has to be collected repeatedly from different sources. Reconciliations work, but depend on multiple manual steps. Or critical parts of the process rely heavily on the knowledge of individual employees.
In the end, everything still gets done.
When “it works” becomes the standard
Not every company needs a complex finance organisation or a sophisticated monthly close.
In smaller and mid-sized businesses, parts of the accounting function may be outsourced and the annual financial statements prepared by an external tax advisor. Other companies have dedicated accounting and reporting teams and prepare their financial statements internally.
The setup may differ, but many of the underlying questions remain the same.
Are invoices and other transactions processed on time? Is there sufficient visibility over outstanding items and current financial information? Are responsibilities clear? Can information be brought together in a transparent and reliable way? And does the process continue to work as requirements increase or key individuals are unavailable?
A good finance process needs to reflect the size, complexity and actual requirements of the business.
Good processes are also about accounting
Efficiency and organisation are only part of the picture.
A strong finance and closing process also needs to ensure that new or unusual transactions are identified early and assessed from an accounting perspective.
New contractual arrangements, financing transactions, acquisitions or changes to the business model may all have accounting implications. The question is therefore not only whether the correct accounting treatment is ultimately determined, but also whether the relevant information reaches the right people at the right time.
Accounting expertise has limited value if relevant information only surfaces during the year-end close. Equally, an efficient process cannot resolve a complex accounting issue on its own.
Strong finance processes bring both sides together: sound accounting and processes that ensure the necessary information is available in a timely and complete manner.
Bringing processes, data and systems together
What an effective finance and reporting process looks like depends on the company's individual situation.
Sometimes, clearer responsibilities, better handovers or targeted changes to individual process steps can already make a significant difference – for example, ensuring that invoices are issued promptly, outstanding items are followed up consistently and information does not have to be collected from scratch every time it is needed.
In other situations, dedicated tools can provide valuable support – for example for structured data collection, aggregation and consolidation, as well as report preparation and disclosure management. Depending on the reporting requirements, tagging may also play a role.
As data volumes, reporting requirements and complexity increase, suitable tools can help bring information together in a more structured way and make reporting processes more efficient and transparent.
The key is to consider accounting requirements, processes, data and systems together: What information is needed? Where do issues arise today? What does the process need to deliver? And where can a tool provide meaningful support?
Does the process work well – or do you simply manage to make it work every time?
Not every manual step is a problem. Not every Excel file needs to disappear. And there is no single finance process that works for every organisation.
But if invoices are regularly issued late, visibility over outstanding matters is limited, information repeatedly has to be pieced together, reconciliations require unnecessary effort or new transactions are assessed too late, it may be worth taking a closer look.
Because producing correct financial statements at the end of the year does not necessarily mean that the process used to get there works well.
Disclaimer: This article is for general information purposes only and does not replace individual advice. The content reflects our assessment at the time of publication and makes no claim to completeness. For an assessment tailored to your company, please get in touch.
Do any of these situations sound familiar?
I support companies with accounting, financial statements and reporting, while also looking at the processes behind them: Where are unnecessary reconciliations or manual steps occurring? Where are information or responsibilities unclear? And where could data, systems or dedicated tools provide useful support?
If you would like to discuss a specific challenge or your current setup, feel free to get in touch.
